FYSE courses of instruction. FYSE 1101 - “A seminar course focusing on contemporary and enduring questions that engage students in intellectual inquiry and academic life while encouraging critical thinking skills and metacognitive reflection.”
Evaluation Plan and measures:
Assessments
- Pretest/posttest (summative assessment)
- Section assignments/activities (formative assessment)
- AAC&U value rubrics (summative assessment)
- Inquiry and Analysis VALUE Rubric (Inquiry Assignment)
- Integrative Learning VALUE Rubric (Signature Assignment)
KPIs:
Baseline measure (for each KPI):
- Initial Pilot courses and expanded offerings to a larger group – post Covid.
- Expansion of the offering of FYSE pilot courses beyond the fall to the spring and summer, and the development of a suitable rotation for the number of course offered each semester.
Current/most recent data (for each KPI)
- Data and related explanations are provided below.
FYSE 1101 Sections by Term, Design, & Modality
FYSE 1101 Sections by Term, Design, & Modality |
|||||
Term |
Total |
Predesigned |
Instructor |
Online |
Honors |
SU20 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
FA20 |
8 |
0 |
8 |
4 |
0 |
SP21 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
SU21 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
FA21 |
11 |
7 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
SP22 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
SU22 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
FA22 |
10 |
8 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
SP23 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
SU23 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
FA23 |
20 |
12 |
8 |
2 |
3 |
Section offerings fluctuated from 1 to 20 with the highest number of sections being offered in the fall semester. The design of the sections shifted from exclusively instructor designed to primarily predesigned in the fall of 2021. The primary modality in fall and spring has been in person with a balance of in person and online courses being offered during the summer.
FYSE 1101 AAC&U Value Rubrics by Term
Integrated Learning |
|||||||||||
Year |
Term |
Course Prefix |
Course # |
Section |
Student # |
Connections to Experience |
Connections to Discipline |
Transfer |
Integrated Communication |
Reflection & Self-Assessment |
Average |
Fall |
2021 |
FYSE |
1101 |
7 |
98 |
0.98 |
0.53 |
0.58 |
0.64 |
0.42 |
0.63 |
Fall |
2022 |
FYSE |
1101 |
8 |
113 |
1.26 |
1.07 |
1.28 |
0.97 |
1.04 |
1.13 |
Spring |
2023 |
FYSE |
1101 |
3 |
33 |
0.76 |
0.48 |
0.64 |
0.45 |
0.27 |
0.52 |
Inquiry & Analysis |
||||||||||||
Year |
Term |
Course Prefix |
Course # |
Section |
Student # |
Topic Selection |
Existing Knowledge, Research, and/or Views |
Design Process |
Analysis |
Conclusions |
Limitations & Implications |
Average |
Fall |
2021 |
FYSE |
1101 |
7 |
98 |
2.00 |
1.42 |
1.96 |
1.38 |
1.47 |
1.36 |
1.48 |
Fall |
2022 |
FYSE |
1101 |
8 |
113 |
1.26 |
1.05 |
1.23 |
0.92 |
0.95 |
0.93 |
1.06 |
Spring |
2023 |
FYSE |
1101 |
3 |
33 |
1.85 |
1.42 |
1.70 |
1.06 |
1.36 |
0.95 |
1.51 |
AAC&U Value Rubrics look at evidence of student learning through a standardized rubric. FYSE 1101 courses use both the Inquiry & Analysis and Integrated Learning Value Rubrics to assess student learning in the course. The rubric uses performance levels for 0-4 (1-benchmark, 2-3-milestones, 3-capstone) and across various related performance descriptors. The expectation is that students in FYSE classes will, on average, place in the the 0-1 (benchmark) performance level criteria. The Signature (fall 2021 only) and Inquiry assignments were used to assess student learning through the application of the Value Rubrics. Findings demonstrate that students are performing within the expected performance level criteria. Findings will be used to address target areas to assist students in consistently scoring at or above the higher end of the targeted performance level criteria.
FYSE 1101 Pretest and Posttest – Student Assessment of Learning Gains
Pretest |
|||||
Year |
Student # |
Understanding |
Skills |
Attitudes |
Integration of Learning |
2020 |
63 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2021 |
149 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2022 |
188 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2023 |
36 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
Posttest |
|||||
Year |
Student # |
Understanding |
Skills |
Attitudes |
Integration of Learning |
2020 |
24 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
2021 |
110 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
2022 |
123 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
2023 |
28 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
Key: 1: Strongly Agree, 2: Agree, 3: Neither Agree or Disagree, 4: Disagree, 5: Strongly Disagree. 1-2: Positive, 4-5: Negative
Findings suggest that students entered the course with perceptions that they possessed high levels of understanding regarding course concepts, the skills needed to be successful in the course and at the institutions, positive attitudes, and the ability to integrate their learning. The posttest suggests that while their perceptions related to their attitudes and abilities to integrate learning remained high, there was a decline in their perceptions of their understanding. This aligns with the expectation that as students learn more, they adjust their perceptions about their understanding considering the realization that they have more to learn. Findings will be used to assist students in processing and evaluating what they have learned in the course.
Goal or targets (for each KPI):
- Continue to expand Experiential Learning experiences in both lower and upper division courses in all departments and within the Core IMPACTS courses.
- As a high impact practice, FYSE 1101 integrated components of experiential learning into the initial course design.
Time period/duration:
- Ongoing. Ultimately, the course/s should be a component of the re-visioned General Education Curriculum for the University.
- Exploring the placement of FYSE courses into the VSU degree pathways and the development of common experiences that connect what students are learning and experiencing in FYSE courses with what they are learning and experiencing in their academic majors and extracurricular activities on and off campus.
Progress:
Continue to identify key stakeholders across major divisions.
Completed a university-wide assessment of desired revisions to the VSU general education design. Prepared related proposals that incorporated recommendations related to the FYSE course into an Institutional Priority course. Submitted proposals through various University committees and obtained approval. Submitted proposal to USG Council on General Education for review. Explored ways in which departments can use the pre-designed FYSE course to incorporate elements of pre-existing discipline related courses. Worked with several instructors to design instructor design courses to be taught in fall 2023. Explored options for future course designers as well as scaling the course, related rotations, and course instructors.
Revision of inquiry assignment (formative assessment) to include additional inquiry components including concept mapping and identification of methods.
Revision of the campus engagement activity to focus on undergraduate research and to pilot the first component of a common experience opportunity that has the potential to be scaled to the entire campus.
Offered a web hybrid version of the FYSE course which incorporates a one day a week synchronous online meeting with the expectation that students will work asynchronously throughout the rest of the week.
Adjustments:
Continued to develop connections with existing institutional initiatives, identifying opportunities for cross disciplinary activity, and the development of a variety of course models and modalities and offering modalities.
Continued efforts to improve communication between divisions that impact student awareness of the availability of FYSE courses and course content and facilitate student enrollment in the FYSE questions as well as their understanding of how the course is relevant to their degree plan.
Focused course design efforts on disciplines that have the ability to sustain consistent course offerings in the programs. Engaged in conversations regarding course designs that while inclusive of discipline related content would be appropriate for students from other disciplines.
Assessed the status of the instructor training design for FYSE courses and explored possible revisions.
- Revision of course training for faculty to specifically focus on new course creation and course redesign of Perspectives courses that are high enrollment courses to include the incorporation of the FYSE course framework.
- Identify opportunities for multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary course designs that can be taught by instructors within programs and/or departments and is not limited to posing the expertise that might be associated with a specific program.
- Development of pilot courses that explore additional course offering mediums such as online hybrids.
- Continued collaboration with First-Year Programs, including the identification of funding, consistent use FYSE courses in First-Year Learning Communities with other courses related to the VSU general education pathway.
- Redesign of the predesigned FYSE course to clearly emphasize the inquiry process.
Challenges
- Scaling of course framework from pilot phase to full implementation to meet the course offering needs within 1-2 academic years.
- Experimentation with classes of larger enrollments.
- Faculty responsibilities and teaching loads within some programs.
- Staff classifications and contract specifications make it challenging to assign staff to teach FYSE courses.
- Meet the course-related demands placed on campus support areas including CELT and eLearning, library services, Academic Support Center, Student Affairs (Career Opportunities, Counseling Center, etc.)
- Support services for courses including peer mentors, graduate teaching assistants, etc.
- Securing long-term funding to sustain the initiative, since FYSE courses are more expensive to operate than the existing Perspectives courses, which are often very large enrollment.
- The presentation of a consistent and coherent description of what the course is, what it does, and how it aligns with institutional and student goals, in the short and long term.
Support Needed
- Creating opportunities to discuss course design, curriculum changes, and related issues with the University System of Georgia Council on General education.
- Development of a system-wide collaborative that provides resources that share best practices, key findings, strategies, etc. from onboarding to graduation and beyond.
- Continued hosting of virtual and in person sharing of best practices (within and without the USG).
- The development of funding/grant opportunities to assist institutions engaging in the design, implementation, and/or revision of institution-specific, evidence-based initiatives.
- Continued sharing of data related to existing initiatives and data needed to explore additional opportunities.