University of North Georgia Campus Plan Update 2016

UNG 2015 Demographics

UNG 2015 (Self-Reporting) Military Data

Total number of  enrollment fall 2014

17, 289

UNG Veteran Enrollment -  Full-Time 

942

Full-Time

69%

UNG Veteran Enrollment - Part-Time 

117

Part-Time

31%

Grand Total

1,059

Adult Learners

16%

First Generation

23%

Low-Income

38%

Underserved Minority Groups

15%

High-impact strategy

Fifteen to Finish campaign, Promote full-time enrollment of 15 credit hours per semester

Related Goal

2:  Increase the number of degrees that are earned “on time” (associate degrees in  2 years, bachelor’s degrees in 4 years)

Demonstration of Priority and/or Impact

Undergraduates enrolled full-time — specifically, 30 or more credits completed

in their first year — are more likely to graduate on time than students who complete fewer credits per year (CCA, 2013)

Primary Point of Contact

Sheila Caldwell, Director of Complete College Georgia

Summary of Activities

While it is too early to report graduation rates of students impacted by 15 to Finish, UNG has successfully implemented the 15 to Finish Game Changing Strategy. The 15 to Finish initiative has been incorporated on all UNG campuses during orientation, resource fairs, and new student convocations to target incoming freshman and transfer students.  The Advising Center advises new freshman to enroll in 15 or more credit hours and has adopted 15 to Finish marketing materials to encourage current students to increase enrollment to a minimum of 15 credit hours per semester. UNG has developed the Right 15 Credit Hours (Appendix A) to encourage students to take classes that count towards college completion and to avoid accumulating excess credits.

Measures of Progress and Success

Measure, metric, or data element

Number of students graduating on time with an associate or bachelor’s Degree

Baseline Measures

Number of students enrolling in 15 or more credits hours

Interim Measures of Progress

Number of students enrolling in 15 or more credits Fall Semesters

Measures of Success

• Number of students completing associate degrees in 2 years.
• Number of students completing bachelor’s degree in 4 years.
• Number of students enrolling for 15 or more credit hours in
• Number of students graduating on time with an associate or bachelor’s Degree

Lessons Learned

 An increase in enrollment and retention has made it challenging to offer 15 or more credit hours to current students. Over 67% of UNG students are traditional and may have the capacity to enroll in more than 12 credit hours per semester. The Student Affairs Division at UNG has hired a new Associate Vice President of Enrollment Management to focus on right size enrollment for each campus. The Associate VP is working with each campus to ensure proper enrollment growth based on resources such as faculty, space, and community needs. UNG has implemented Ad Astra software to measure and predict demand for courses. The software has also served as a resource to predict hiring needs for courses. We have learned that educating students and parents on the benefits of on-time college completion has empowered students to make better choices.  

High-impact strategy

Expand MOWR programs

Related Goal

6: Shorten time to degree completion through programs that allow students to earn college credit while still in high school

Demonstration of Priority and/or Impact

 According to the U.S. Department of Education, college credit earned prior to high school graduation reduces the average time­-to-degree and increases the likelihood of graduation for the students who participate in these programs. There is also evidence that MOWR increases academic performance and educational attainment.

Primary Point of Contact

Charles Bell, MOWR Coordinator

Summary of Activities

UNG conducted MOWR Recruitment Events and Counselor Workshops on each campus during fall 2015 and spring 2016. Parents and students visited our campuses to learn about dual credit opportunities. Each campus assigned an MOWR academic advisor for high school students, parents, and counselors to provide information, assist with orientations, complete registration, and matriculate students into UNG upon high school graduation. We have developed a model to strategically deliver MOWR courses to rural high schools in our service area. For the 2015 school year, UNG partnered with Jackson and Union County School Systems in the delivery of MOWR courses at the high schools. This year, we have expanded our partnership to include six Hall County High Schools to deliver MOWR courses at Jones Early College. Transportation is offered to include high-ability students who may be economically disadvantaged.

Measures of Progress and Success

Measure, Metric, or Data Element

• Number of students enrolled in MOWR
• Number of credits awarded to MOWR students
• Number of high schools from which we draw MOWR students
• Percent of MOWR students who matriculate into UNG immediately following high school completion

Baseline Measures

• Number of students enrolled in MOWR
• Number of credits awarded to MOWR students
• Number of high schools from which we MOWR students
• Percent of MOWR students who matriculate into UNG immediately following high school completion

Interim Measures of Progress

UNG had 625 students participate in MOWR fall 2015 compared to 462 fall 2014. UNG awarded a total of 6, 684 credits in 2014 compared to 8,862 credits showing a significant increase of 35.28% in the number of participants and a 32.59% in the number of credit hours earned in the 2015 academic year. Additionally, UNG retained 54.7% of MOWR participants who graduated spring 2016 compared to 50.2% of MOWR students who graduated spring 2015. Students in the MOWR program participated from 76 different high schools in fall 2015 compared to 62 different high schools in fall 2014. UNG has had two MOWR students earned associate degrees this past Spring. Furthermore, five MOWR students are positioned to earn associate degrees by Spring 2017. Preliminary statistics based on fall 2016 enrollment to date show an increase of 226% from fall 2013 to fall 2016.

Measures of Success

• Number of students enrolled in MOWR
• Number of credits awarded to MOWR students
• Number of high schools from which we draw MOWR students
• Percent of MOWR students who matriculate into UNG immediately following high school completion
• Number of MOWR students who graduate college early or on time.

Lessons Learned

Due to high growth and matriculation rates of MOWR students, UNG MOWR Advisors developed a customized orientation to help students progress and complete programs of study at UNG.  The high growth of MOWR students is compelling UNG to look at all of its populations to manage growth and “right size” each segment of our student population.  Therefore, we will utilize eCore to provide access to college-level courses to MOWR students. We also want to ensure that MOWR students are successful. As a result, 2016 MOWR participants will be required to achieve a 2.5 GPA after the first two semesters to maintain enrollment at UNG. Their GPA has an impact on their future HOPE eligibility beyond high school and we want to position students for success beyond high school. The students who persist with UNG upon high school completion receive assistance to schedule classes to prevent duplication of coursework and to accelerate degree completion. UNG now has a full-time dedicated MOWR Coordinator who provides more college opportunities for students, support relationships with high school counselors, coordinate student advising and ensure successful matriculation for MOWR participants.  

High-impact strategy

Promote the CLEP exam

Related Goal

6: Shorten time to degree completion through programs that allow students to earn college credit by awarding credit for prior learning that is verified by appropriate assessment.

Demonstration of Priority and/or Impact

A 2010 study by the Council for Adult and Experiential Learning, funded by the Lumina Foundation, showed that students with prior-learning assessment (PLA), such as CLEP, had better academic outcomes than students without prior learning assessment. The study showed that PLA students earning bachelor's degrees saved an average of 2.5 to 10.1 months of time in earning their degrees. PLA students earning associate’s degrees saved an average of 1.5 to 4.5 months.

Primary Point of Contact

Kathy Rich, Interim Director of Testing  

Summary of Activities

During the 2015-2016 academic year, Academic advisors and the coordinator of the Center for Adult Learners and the Military (CALM) have encouraged incoming freshman, adults, transfer, and military students to take advantage of prior learning credit. Information regarding prior learning credit is now incorporated into our 15-to-Finish presentation at New Student Orientations. This year the Student Affairs Division implemented resources fair and provided another opportunity to educate students on the benefits of prior learning assessment.   

Measure of Progress and Success

Measure, Metric, or data element

• Credit awarded based on CLEP Scores
• Number of students who graduate on-time or early due to CLEP

Baseline Measures

• Number of tests administered.
• Number of credits awarded based on CLEP scores.

Interim Measures

Of Progress

The College Board highlighted UNG in its 2014 Spotlight on Best Practices in using CLEP. UNG has been number one in the state of Georgia for total number of CLEP exams administered and in the top 100 in the nation for total number of CLEP exams administered for the past three years. In the 2014-2015 academic year the institution administered a total of 970 CLEP tests and awarded 3,668 credits. In the 2015-2016 academic year UNG administered 1087 exams and awarded 4,147 credits.

Measures of Success

• Number of tests administered
• Number of credits awarded based on CLEP scores
• Rank in the State of Georgia for CLEP exams administered
• Number of students who graduate on-time or early due to CLEP

Lessons Learned

Although CLEP is an effective strategy for shortening time to degree completion, UNG has learned that all USG institutions do not accept CLEP credit on transcripts from other USG institutions. Some institutions require students to take additional assessments. We have made provisions to communicate policies with parents and students who seek to transfer CLEP credit.

High-impact strategy

Expand completely online opportunities

Related Goal

8: Restructure instructional delivery to support educational excellence and student success

Demonstration of Priority and/or Impact

Students who enroll in eCore courses can complete core courses on line towards fulfillment of a two-year Associate of Arts or Sciences degree or complete core courses to earn a baccalaureate degree. This strategy promotes Go Back, Move Ahead for adult learners and overall student success. Students can take courses conveniently on-line without interrupting their college careers due to a lack of available courses on campus or a lack of resources.

Primary Point of Contact

Stephanie Hulsey, Coordinator of Online Student Success

Summary of Activities

UNG continues to increase the number of courses offered online, while ensuring the quality of these courses by requiring all online courses to undergo a Quality Matters review.  To expand these opportunities more rapidly, and to strategically target its own course development resources, the institution became an eCore affiliate in spring 2014. UNG hired an eCore advisor to serve as a single point of contact for eCore students and to contact and assist at-risk students. We have also implemented Smarter Measure as an orientation and readiness screening tool to help students be successful in their online courses.

Measures of Progress and Success

Measures, metric, or data element

Number and % of degrees conferred in which at least one course has been fully online.

Baseline Status

• Number of credits attempted in fall for courses offered completely online.
• Number of credits successfully completed in fall for courses offered completely online.

Interim Measures

Of Progress

From fall 2013 to fall 2016, UNG online course enrollment combined with eCore online course enrollment spiked from 2,158 participants to 3,018 participants. The overall increase for the past three academic years is 39%.  Greater gains were made in online course registrations. From fall 2013 to fall 2016, course registrations increased by 53%. Completion rates for online courses average 82.34%. 

Measures of Success

• Number of credits attempted in fall, spring, and summer for courses offered completely online.
• Number of credits successfully completed in fall, spring, and summer for courses offered completely online.
• Number and % of degrees conferred in which at least one course has been fully online.
• Number of degrees conferred to adults students in which at least one course has been fully online.

Lessons Learned

The on-line orientation was implemented fall 2014 to inform students about expectations in an on-line course and encourage them to utilize resources to achieve academic success. UNG learned that students who participated in the on-line orientation have consistently earned higher grades point averages than students who did not participate over the past two years.

Provide tutoring to students who are risk for failing Math courses with high drop, failure, and withdrawal (DFW) rates.  

Related Goal

3: Provide intrusive advising to keep students on track to graduate.

Demonstration of Priority and/or Impact

UNG students who visited the Academic, Computing, Tutoring and Testing (ACTT) Center for math tutoring demonstrated significantly higher pass rates in math courses with DFW rates than students who did not attend the tutoring center for assistance with math. Students who are not successful in Math courses will be required to repeat the course which increases delay for on-time college completion, increases risk for academic probation and increase risks of college incompletion.   

Primary Point of Contact

Hieu Huynh, Director of Tutoring Services

Summary of Activities

The Director of Tutoring Services attended department meetings with math faculty advisors, presented at New Faculty Orientations, and ensured Math instructors communicated to students during the first week of class about the services and benefits of attending the ACTT center early in the semester. The Tutoring Director also worked with faculty advisors to ascertain comparison data for students who attending ACTT versus students who did not.

Measures of Progress and Success

Measure, Metric, or Data Element

• Pass rates for students who participated in tutoring sessions
• Pass rates for students who did not participate in tutoring sessions

Baseline Measures

• Number of tutoring requests
• Number of tutoring sessions
• Pass rates for students who participated in tutoring sessions

Interim Measures of Progress

Measures of Success

• Pass rates for students who participated in tutoring sessions
• Pass rates for students who did not participate in tutoring sessions

Lessons Learned

The Director of the ACTT Center will disaggregate data based on student populations to determine which student populations (traditional, adults, transfer) are more likely to utilize ACTT Center. Data will also reveal which student groups performed better. New insights may show a need to offer more tutoring services on-line and on Saturday for adult learners.

High-impact strategy

Provide tutoring to students who are risk for failing English 1101 courses

Related Goal

3: Provide intrusive advising to keep students on track to graduate.

Demonstration of Priority and/or Impact

UNG students who visited the Writing Center for English 1101 tutoring demonstrated significantly higher pass rates than students who did not attend the Writing Center for assistance with English 1101. Students who are not successful in English 1101 will be required to repeat the course which increases delay for on-time college completion, increases risk for academic probation and increase risks of college incompletion.    

Primary Point of Contact

Hieu Huynh, Director of ACTT Center

Summary of Activities

The UNG Writing Center was very proactive in educating new and returning students about the effective and free services provided to UNG students. During the 2015-2016 academic school year, the Writing Center registered 1,148 new clients, conducted 12 Writing Center Tours and 10 in-Class workshops with English 1101 Faculty Advisors. As a result, 1,174 students learned about topics on analyzing journal articles, formatting, note-taking, and plagiarism. Sessions lasted 30 minutes - 60 minutes. Faculty and student evaluations were favorable.      

Measure of Progress and Success  

Measure, Metric, or data element

• Pass rates for students who participated in tutoring sessions
• Pass rates for students who did not participate in tutoring sessions

Baseline Measures

• Students who visit Writing Center 2 or more times
• Number of students registered to visit Writing Center
• Students who request revisions

Interim Measures

Of Progress

In fall, 2014, 93% of students who attended the Writing Center two or more times earned an A, B, or C in English 1101 compared to 61% who did not attend. In fall, 2015, 94% of students who attended the Writing Center two or more times earned an A, B, or C in English 1101 compared to 56% who did not seek tutoring assistance.

Measures of Success

• Pass rates for students who visited the Writing Center 2 or more times
• Comparison data to show college completion rates for students who utilize The Writing Center compared to those do not

Lessons Learned

The Writing Center Director found that more students participated in targeted, in-class workshops than the general sessions conducted in the Writing Center, fall, 2015. This past fall, 68 students attended general sessions in the Writing Center compared to 427 in-class workshops with faculty advisors. Therefore, in Spring 2016, the Writing Center focused on primarily collaborating with faculty advisors in the English Department to increase the numbers of students contacted and educated on the services and effectiveness of the Writing Center.  The Spring sessions resulted in an additional 140 students benefitting from the center as a result of working solely with faculty advisors.    

High-impact strategy

Intentional  Advising

Related Goal

Goal 4: Provide intentional advising to keep students on track to graduate.

Demonstration of Priority and/or Impact

On Time and On-Target Advising is a priority because it was selected by President Jacobs, her Cabinet and faculty members to be the Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) as part of SACSCOC reaffirmation. The blended advising model aims to strengthen students, faculty, and professional advisors role in advising to increase college completion.

Primary Point of Contact

Terri Carroll, Executive Director of Advising

Summary of Activities

In spring 2016, UNG presented its Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP)”On Time and On Target” as part of its SACSCOC reaffirmation. The QEP was approved with no recommendations at all. UNG's QEP uses intentional advising and faculty mentoring to develop students' confidence in their ability to achieve their educational goals and to support student responsibility in accomplishing those educational goals. More specifically, the QEP will improve advising at UNG by adding additional professional advisors, requiring mandatory advisement, instituting advising tools such as program of study sheets and degree sequence guidelines, and establishing Maximize Your Major sessions presented by faculty and professional advisors at new student orientations. Implementation began in spring 2016 with incoming students majoring in biology, pre-nursing, criminal justice, psychology and open option students on the Dahlonega campus. Additional majors and campuses will be phased in gradually over four years.

Measures of Progress and Success

Measure, Metric, or Data Element

• Number of Students Participating in Maximizing Major Orientation Sessions
• Number of Student Meetings Expectations in Learning Outcomes
• Increase Number of Students Progressing and Completing College

Baseline Measures

• Number of Students Participating in Maximizing Major Orientation Sessions
• Number of Students Participating in On-Time and On-Target Academic Blended Academic Advising Model  

Interim Measures of Progress

• Number of Students Participating in Maximizing Major Orientation Sessions
• Number of Student Meetings Expectations in Learning Outcomes

Measures of Success

• Number of Students Participating in Maximizing Major Orientation Sessions
• Increase number of Students Participating in On-Time and On-Target Blended Academic Advising model 
• Increase Number of Students Progressing and Completing College

Lessons Learned

UNG has learned it is important to design an advising model that is based on the interests and abilities of each student that will permit success in their personal and professional goals. The blended advising model is a collaborative effort between students, professional advisors and faculty members. Students benefit from professional advisors who are specially trained to teach them about university policies, procedures, and program requirements, including developing short- and long-term educational plans. Furthermore, students also learn that changing majors can lead to delayed college completion. Faculty advisors provide expertise related to majors and experiential opportunities that students can pursue to support educational goals. The blended advising model aims to encourage students to take ownership of their academic plan and to foster critical thinking skills and decision making.  The blended advising approach seeks to keep students “On Time and On Target” to maximize the educational experience and enhance successful academic program completion.